JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 23, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Jairo Segura Ortega

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fallo De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-099/16.

El memorialista le pidió a la Sala aclarar si el fallo de la referencia revocó la sentencia de primera instancia, toda vez que en su parte resolutiva solamente hizo referencia a la revocatoria del fallo de segunda instancia.

Teniendo en cuenta que la solicitud de aclaración fue formulada de manera extemporánea, la Sala de Revisión decidió RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Quinta de Revision de Tutelas de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-099 de 2016, presentada por Jairo Segura Ortega, el 30 de mayo de 2017.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.